W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:09:50 -0500
Message-Id: <5f98a6f31ac2a18d326f57d86b2a846c@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

I was just trying to explain some stuff about sparql to some folks, and 
I realized, again, the pain it is not to have numbers on the 
definitions (so I can say things like Definition 1). I believe I've 
mentioned this before, but, eh, so many months, so much email, so many 
phone calls....

Is it possible to slip this (minor, editorial) change in?

No big, but I think it could make life a touch easier.

Received on Sunday, 26 March 2006 23:09:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC