Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR)

I was just trying to explain some stuff about sparql to some folks, and 
I realized, again, the pain it is not to have numbers on the 
definitions (so I can say things like Definition 1). I believe I've 
mentioned this before, but, eh, so many months, so much email, so many 
phone calls....

Is it possible to slip this (minor, editorial) change in?

No big, but I think it could make life a touch easier.

Cheers,
Bijan.