W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:41:34 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143412894.12963.662.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 18:27 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349
[...]
> 
> Please indicate your support (or otherwise) via this form:
>   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/
> 
> This questionnaire is open for answers until 23:59, Boston time on
> 2006-03-26, so that I can have them all when I prepare
> the agenda for next week's call.

I have extended the deadline to 2006-03-28 in hopes that
Oracle can confirm that their concerns are addressed.

Also, regarding my action...

ACTION: DanC to send [OK?] msg to 2006-02-22T23:56:54Z Peter F. 
Patel-Schneider on Section 1 and Section 2, basically, [needstest]
 -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0465.html

I did send such an [OK?] [needstest] message as we discussed,
with Enrico present, but Enrico seems to not support this course
of action after all...

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:57:37 +0200
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Mar/0062.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Sunday, 26 March 2006 22:42:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT