W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:15:49 -0600
To: "souripriya.das@oracle.com" <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
Cc: eric@w3.org, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143321350.12963.609.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 10:33 -0500, souripriya.das@oracle.com wrote:
> Two things:
> 1) I need more time to discuss this within Oracle. 

How much more time?

> 2) I need a confirmation of my following understanding of the process:
> A "YES" vote from me at this point for transition to CR does not
> prevent Oracle from raising new issues or pursuing further any of the
> issues that have been raised earlier by Oracle folks even after the
> SPARQL documents move to the CR phase. Thus, for example, if Fred
> Zemke wants to pursue some of his earlier comments further, even after
> SPARQL documents move to CR with my "YES" vote, he will be allowed to
> do that (that is, he will not be prevented from doing that based on
> any technicalities of the W3C process).

If Oracle finds _new_ information after we enter CR, then the
WG is obliged to consider it.

But Fred's earlier comments will not be new information with respect
to the CR decision we're making this week. Once we have made
this decision (assuming we do make it), it will not be in order
to go back over them without new information.

So we need to know if they've been handled to your satisfaction.

> > Please indicate your support (or otherwise) via this form:
> >   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Saturday, 25 March 2006 21:15:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC