W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:26:32 -0500
Message-Id: <85635301-9698-4743-87F4-F7D3F41E3C87@monkeyfist.com>
To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

I've updated the editor's draft for the protocol doc:

	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/

to: $Revision: 1.115 $ of $Date: 2006/03/24 18:24:01 $

The change log for this latest revision says:

updated WSDL 2.0 links
updated description of In-Out MEP
updated definition of Fault Replaces Message rule
fixed a bug where I refer to an XML Schema excerpt as a WSDL excerpt
synched excerpts of the WSDL with the WSDL (the namespace fixes from  
1.18/19 of
sparql-protocol-query.wsdl; and the wsdlx:safety="true" fixes too)
changed "practicable" to "practical"
removed the word "respectively"
added actual long query for post example
put todo span marker around the results for the long query and the  
kanji example -- these are still TODO
made a link to the sparqlx.rnc in an informative HTTP example (all  
the HTTP examples are informative)

My TODO list for the editor's draft says:

add results for long query example
add results for kanji example

But as these are merely bits missing from informative examples, I  
don't believe they should be an impediment to going to CR with this doc.

Cheers,
Kendall


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEJDnZMWrdIbaAVEURAlGuAJ9oQi4Sm0cZlpLAzBLw0pmfpxVQKgCdFZNz
lLstivy0fBtvwU4zMtlnreA=
=BIWo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 18:26:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT