W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:41:59 -0600
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143045719.12963.334.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 21:28 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 7:27 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > So we discussed this CR request today.
> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349
> >
> > I edited out all but one of the remaining @@'s
> > (I still owe PFPS a reply. I'll do that tomorrow).
> I don't believe there's anything substantive outstanding re: protocol  
> doc, but I wanted to send you a list of my outstanding changes that  
> need to be completed (hopefully by end of biz on Friday):

Very well, please do check in these edits by Friday.

I consider that these fall under "plus edits as agreed 21 March";
so this is sort of an ammendment to the meeting record, if you like.

Explicit endorsement of these changes is also welcome, either
before or after WG members see them, and either in email to the
list or in your WBS response.

> 1. find a long query for the POST example (I think LeeF is still  
> gonna send me one)
> 2. finish the Kanji example
> 3. update the WSDL, rq23, and results format links
> 4. explain the XML syntax example a bit more
> Just FYI -- I don't believe any of these impede or impact a decision  
> to go to CR.
> Cheers,
> Kendall
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:42:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC