W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:19:51 -0500
Message-Id: <FE6B867F-04AB-4C89-9D84-498F5BAC756F@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>


On Mar 21, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:38 -0500, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> Howdy,
>
> Hi. Thanks for doing this right away!

Indeed. I should have done it ages ago. -sigh-: there's no real  
excuse, but god how I hate dealing with Java! :<

Btw, I take it to be additional confirmation of the resolution (in  
our favor) of the issues we discussed earlier that the lastest Woden  
didn't complain about those two aspects of our HTTP bindings (either  
the maxOccurs="unbounded" or the Interface Operation name "query"  
rather than "query-request")...

I don't know if that really discharges my action, but it helps boost  
confidence.

> Hmm... I'll have to add these to the WBS form that asks if we're ready
> for CR.
>
> Kendall, the sooner you can review these diffs and let us know
> if you concur the better. Please apply them and check them in
> if you concur. If you disagree, please explain.

I concur, and as of 1.18 (just checked in) the canonical WSDL is  
patched.

Cheers,
Kendall
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 19:20:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT