W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:47:37 -0600
To: Libby Miller <libby@asemantics.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1142891257.12963.115.camel@dirk.w3.org>

hypertext:  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda

plain text:

    1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-03-21T14:30Z
       ([2]local times)

          + Comments on the agenda: I'm caught up as far as finding all
            the relevant actions; I have found some of the relevant
            progress reports, but I think there may be more.

            Sorry it's late again. And sorry I flaked last week. I have
            been busy [3]travelling: [4]tech plenary, [5]SXSWi in
            Austin, [6]security workshop in NY

          + teleconference bridge: [7]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
          + scribe: JanneS
               o supplementary IRC chat: [8]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
                 ([9]log to appear)
          + roll call. regrets: Libby Miller, Sven Groppe
          + PROPOSED: to ammend [10]Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006
            to show Elias Torres present and correct the spelling of
            Souripriya Das, and to approve it, as ammended, as a true
          + PROPOSED: to meet again 27 March, 1400Z; recruit scribe;
            confirm chair
          + Let's note these done without discussion:
               o ACTION: EricP to email the semweb CG about a
                 sparql-dev mailing list. Done; see [11]new mailing
                 list from DanC 9 Mar
               o ACTION: AndyS to change "this is" to "RDF graphs are"
                 in response to both [2006-02-22T20:32:56Z Peter F.
                 Patel-Schneider] and [2006-02-22T23:56:54Z Peter F.
               o There's an editing action implicit in the decision
                 from last week; it seems to be done in the
                 [12]editor's draft v1.663 of 2006/03/16 17:04:47
    2. comments related to [13]rdfSemantics, [14]owlDisjunction
          + ACTION: Enrico to explain definitions in reply to LeeF's
            questions (done, yes?)
          + ACTION LeeF: to find email thread about wording of
            restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP;
            follow up on that to get text back into rq23
          + ACTION: SergioT to ask Ian Horrocks if he is satisfied with
            DAWG resolution of owlDisjunction
          + ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from
            2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard
          + ACTION: SergioT to respond to [2005-09-18T15:02:48Z Peter
            F. Patel-Schneider]
          + ACTION: SerT to make test case for bnode scope in different
            BGPs [15]progress
    3. Toward CR: protocol editing, etc.
          + ACTION: KC to update protocol references to [SRD] and WSDL
          + ACTION: KendallC to edit proto-wd w.r.t. decision: in case
            of syntax error [including extension], must return
            malformed query or query request refused
          + ACTION: KC to work on edited changelog since 2005-09-14
            LCWD; in progress... done?
          + ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator,
            report results.
    4. Toward CR: exit criteria
          + ACTION: SteveH and AndyS to map approved tests to UC&R
            features [16]progress; done?
          + ACTION: DanC to noodle on SOAP exit criteria
    5. Toward CR, comments, misc
          + ACTION: DanC to respond to [17]major technical:
            underspecified errors
          + ACTION: DanC to join the [2005-09-08T01:26:59Z Peter F.
            Patel-Schneider] thread with PPS's late Feb comments
          + ACTION: DanC to fix the "inconsistent use of terminology"
            [2005-09-23T14:34:50Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread
          + ACTION: AndyS to respond to [2006-02-22T14:46:35Z Arjohn
          + ACTION: EricP to respond to [2006-02-23T09:38:05Z Arjohn
          + ACTION: AndyS to respond to [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier
          + ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier
[            Corby], potentially automating examples2tests [18]progress
          + ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on
            [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]
          + [19]lc comment status: as of v1.58: 50 closed, 60 pending,
            and 18 open (6 re rdfSemantics, 11 from Oracle, 1 from
               o Charmod conformance; my [20]OK? message has a forward
                 reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG
                 review in reply
          + ACTION: DanC to draft request for CR progress: [21]CR
            request, in progress
    6. MIME type registrations
          + ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests ([22]2Mar)
    7. test suite maintenance
          + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
            op:dateTime triple
          + ACTION: Jeen to figure out whether he can become test case
            editor and report back by telecon on Mar 14
       See also [23]comment threads marked [test-todo] and [24]REQUEST
       FOR TESTCASE in WG threads
    8. JSON results format
          + ACTION: Elias When finialized, email the WG for review as
            possible WG Note. Review offered by: AndyS, Sergio, Steve

      [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
      [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=03&day=21&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
      [3] http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/#travl
      [4] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/92
      [5] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/93
      [6] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/97
      [7] tel:+1.617.761.6200
      [8] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
      [9] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-dawg-irc
     [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0448.html
     [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0436.html
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics
     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction
     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0446.html
     [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0455.html
     [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0066.html
     [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0452.html
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
     [20] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf6#pubIssues
     [23] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-rdf-dawg-comments&index-type=t&keywords=test-todo&search=Search
     [24] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=request+for+testcase&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-rdf-dawg

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 21:47:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC