W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:37:14 -0600
Message-Id: <p06230906bffd7e1c68fc@[10.100.0.23]>
To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

>On 25 Jan 2006, at 18:58, Enrico Franconi wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>On 25 Jan 2006, at 18:55, Enrico Franconi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>On 25 Jan 2006, at 18:41, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>>>Enrico Franconi wrote:
>>>>>Another proposed simplification:
>>>>>Currently:
>>>>>Definition:  Scoping Set
>>>>>A Scoping Set B is a set of RDF terms formed by the combination of:
>>>>>      * all URIs
>>>>>      * blank node names
>>>>>This could just be:
>>>>>A Scoping Set is an arbitrary subset of the RDF terms.
>>>>
>>>>I thought the point was that it is always all IRIs (oops 
>>>>s/URI/IRI) and some set of blank nodes (but not all of them). 
>>>>That then ties to "The identifiers introduced by S all occur in 
>>>>B." in the BGP matching defn.
>>>
>>>Well, yes, you are right.
>>
>>More precisely: in sparql we have all the B includes only the 
>>bnodes in G'; then, we have to leave room for future extensions. 
>>For example, for OWL data queries, B does not include any bnode; 
>>and there is an understanding of RDF entailment where you may want 
>>to have all bnodes in B.
>
>OK, I have to read what I write :-)
>
>s/all the B/that B/

It must be more nuanced than this for the general case. I don't think 
we can stipulate that B must contain *all* IRIs, in general. For 
example, OWL-DL would want to restrict the IRIs allowed in answer 
bindings to exclude the excluded vocabulary. (?Enrico?) Also, someone 
might offer a specialized query service that focused on giving 
particular classes of answer and ignores others, for example. I think 
if we use B then we should just keep it as general as possible in the 
general case, and require future specs to specify it appropriately in 
each case.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 19:37:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT