W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:15:56 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1138043756.4991.331.camel@dirk.w3.org>

hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda

plain text:

    1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-01-24T14:30Z
       ([2]local times)
          + Comments on the agenda? sorry it's late again. And I
            haven't updated the [3]comment status in the last few days
          + teleconference bridge: [4]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
          + scribe: libby
               o supplementary IRC chat: [5]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
                 ([6]log to appear)
          + roll call
          + PROPOSED: to approve [7]RDF Data Access Working Group -- 17
            Jan 2006 as a true record
          + PROPOSED: to meet again Thu, 26 Jan 1600Z; recruit scribe;
            confirm chair
          + Let's note these done without discussion:
               o ACTION: KC to send an [OK?] msg re HTTP Status Codes
                 for QueryRequestRefused and to paul etc. [8]done
               o ACTION: EricP to respond to, or at least consider,
                 [9]BASE absolute IRIs of 9 Dec 2005. [10]done
          + Let's continue these without discussion: @@
    2. Toward updated protocol WD (and results format WD)
          + ACTION: DanC to noodle on status, publish
    3. issues [11]rdfSemantics, [12]owlDisjunction
          + ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically
            equivalent" vs graph equivalent. [13]done. Steve OK to make
            that change? somebody else?
          + ACTION: PatH revise Enrico's [14]"Proposed changes" on
            matching and entailment for solution sequences, esp w.r.t.
            RDFmerge/order. seems done; there has certainly been lots
            of relevant mail
          + ACTION: Enrico to review draft text on matching and
            entailment for solution sequences seems done; there has
            certainly been lots of relevant mail
          + ACTION: JosD to make test case from [15]Sergio's basic
            query patterns examples
       Note about 5 relevant comments, which seem to be addressed by
       the editor's draft.
       PROPOSED: that [16]SPARQL QL editor's draft v1.613 2006/01/23
       13:13:08 addresses issue rdfSemantics and is sufficient to
       postpone issue owlDisjunction.
    4. issues#valueTesting
          + ACTION EricP: add test case for support of xsd:boolean (ala
            (?a = ?b) = "true"^^xsd:boolean )  [17]DONE
       We approved some tests last week; I see Revision 1.608
       2006/01/18 01:33:37 eric ~ clarify value of an EBV per message
       to DAWG. Are we done? PROPOSED that we are.
    5. Toward CR
          + [18]lc comment status: 26 open, 32 pending, and 36 closed
            as of v1.46 of 2006/01/11 18:44:29 (also: lists in editor's
            drafts)
               o Charmod conformance; my [19]OK? message has a forward
                 reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG
                 review in reply
          + substantive changes since last call... 20 Dec rf1 change
            (jeen offered to do a test case). @@link to summary of
            changes in rq23. no changes to protocol that are observable
            on-the-wire, right?
          + Dependencies:
               o XQuery WG review ([20]rxd 13Sep)
                 The "use XQuery" objection from NI was largely
                 addressed by a presentation from Melton at XML2005
               o meet requirements of ebXML Registry TC and freebXML
                 Registry open source implementation? ([21]10 Nov from
                 Farrukh)
               o charter calls for "architectural review" by
                 [22]Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment (SWBPD)
                 Working Group
                 [23]Wood 26 Sep is relevant, as Wood is a co-chair of
                 SWBPD WG
               o [24]ietf-types review of
                 application/sparql-results+xml , [25]ietf-types review
                 of application/sparql-query
          + see also: [26]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases...
            schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
    6. test suite maintenance
          + ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
            results
          + ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes for
            later WG approval [27]DONE
          + ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with
            negative tests [recorded in
            [28]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
          + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
            op:dateTime triple
          + ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from
            comment on truth tables in [29]commentor's message

      [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
      [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=01&day=24&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
      [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
      [4] tel:+1.617.761.6200
      [5] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
      [6] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-dawg-irc
      [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/att-0138/17-dawg-minutes-edited.htm
      [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0104
      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Dec/0008
     [10] http://www.w3.org/mid/20060117074412.GU17752@w3.org
     [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction
     [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0145.html
     [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0030.html
     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0021.html
     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
     [17] http://www.w3.org/mid/20060113014908.GI7513@w3.org
     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
     [19] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
     [20] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050913082804661.00000000668@amalhotr-pc
     [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0267.html
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/BestPractices/
     [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0077.html
     [24] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000895.html
     [25] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000894.html
     [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
     [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html
     [28] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
     [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 19:16:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT