Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns

On Jan 19, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Enrico Franconi wrote:

>
> On 19 Jan 2006, at 23:20, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>> In my text, I am proposing to have an informative statement saying 
>>> that a safe way to have a working SPARQL with OWL-DL entailment is 
>>> to restrict the scoping set B to include only URIs, and to have the 
>>> above syntactic restrictions to the SPARQL BGPs.
>>
>> Good idea, provided only that we don't use the official label 
>> "OWL-DL" for this case which I think would be misleading. How about 
>> just calling it "simple OWL" or maybe "basic OWL" or some such 
>> qualification (?)
>
> Fair enough.

Ooo, the naming wars :)

How about "OWL DL ABox query", or "OWL DL factual query", or "OWL DL 
instance query"?

Cheers,
Bijan.