W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:28:14 -0500
Message-Id: <3c4e2e2275691e54c75da2d7e481abf1@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>

On Jan 19, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Enrico Franconi wrote:

> On 19 Jan 2006, at 23:20, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>> In my text, I am proposing to have an informative statement saying 
>>> that a safe way to have a working SPARQL with OWL-DL entailment is 
>>> to restrict the scoping set B to include only URIs, and to have the 
>>> above syntactic restrictions to the SPARQL BGPs.
>> Good idea, provided only that we don't use the official label 
>> "OWL-DL" for this case which I think would be misleading. How about 
>> just calling it "simple OWL" or maybe "basic OWL" or some such 
>> qualification (?)
> Fair enough.

Ooo, the naming wars :)

How about "OWL DL ABox query", or "OWL DL factual query", or "OWL DL 
instance query"?

Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 06:28:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC