On 19 Jan 2006, at 23:20, Pat Hayes wrote: >> In my text, I am proposing to have an informative statement saying >> that a safe way to have a working SPARQL with OWL-DL entailment is >> to restrict the scoping set B to include only URIs, and to have >> the above syntactic restrictions to the SPARQL BGPs. > > Good idea, provided only that we don't use the official label "OWL- > DL" for this case which I think would be misleading. How about just > calling it "simple OWL" or maybe "basic OWL" or some such > qualification (?) Fair enough. --e.Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:28:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT