W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:25:25 -0500
Message-Id: <8f5e6eec263dc113cbbb7fcbf0abccd3@w3.org>
Cc: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna.biz>, andy.seaborne@hp.com, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>

On Jan 17, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:57:18PM +0100, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
>> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>> Comment on old syntax tests.  What happens about the approved ones?
>>> Some at least, are named "*oldsyntax" in HTML document but I guess
>>> people also go straight to the directory structure.
>>> Is there anyway to get a listing of the tests that are current?  I 
>>> sthat
>>> part of CR work?
>> Is there any reason to keep the old tests around as-is rather than 
>> just
>> updating them to current syntax?
> I propose that the WG decide that test editors have licence to update
> any approved test to follow syntax changes.

That's more of a process change than I know how to handle.
Let's please keep it where changing an approved test needs explicit WG 

I wonder how we got out of sync? I try to keep the tests consistent
with WG decisions.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 14:25:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC