W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases]

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:06:57 -0500
To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna.biz>
Cc: andy.seaborne@hp.com, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20060117140657.GN7513@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:57:18PM +0100, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> >Comment on old syntax tests.  What happens about the approved ones?
> >
> >Some at least, are named "*oldsyntax" in HTML document but I guess 
> >people also go straight to the directory structure.
> >
> >Is there anyway to get a listing of the tests that are current?  I sthat 
> >part of CR work?
> Is there any reason to keep the old tests around as-is rather than just 
> updating them to current syntax?

I propose that the WG decide that test editors have licence to update
any approved test to follow syntax changes.

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 14:07:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC