W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:07:08 -0500
Message-Id: <8050246fd10a15871fb7079cbc4ea37d@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>

On Jan 14, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Enrico Franconi wrote:

> Hi,
> we ask to finalise the text of Section 2.5.

Me too.

[snip rebuttal of pat]

> At this point it is becoming too late. We ask that either our text is 
> used (with possible editorial changes to discuss),

In fact, I though we agreed to do this. I don't know of any technincal 
errors or issues with the proposed text, and many of the tweaks and 
variations being proposed for "clarity" have fall down. Hard. There are 
a *lot* of complex and subtle issues. We should go with what *works*.

> or that the DAWG does not conclude the work on the 31st of January and 
> we'll have a F2F during the W3C tech plenary in France at the end of 
> February.
> We recall that our text provides the use of entailment, the 
> correspondence with the subgraph matching based implementations, and 
> uniqueness of solutions for interoperability; its core definitions are 
> stable since its appearance on the 2nd of November 2005 
> <http://www.inf.unibz.it/krdb/w3c/sparql/>.
[snip]

While allowing for a reasonably clean extension to more expressive 
languages from RDF and RDFS through OWL (and others, really). In fact, 
it would be rather simple for us to produce a submission (working 
group?) explaining how to do this.

It would be nice to settle this as it would be nice to make some 
progress on the algebra.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Monday, 16 January 2006 16:07:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT