A while ago, it became clear that, since we were talking about xsd:boolean in the spec, the type should probably be recognized by SPARQL. To that end, I've created these tests: EBV result is the same as xsd:boolean -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-logical-or "false"^^xsd:boolean = "0"^^xsd:boolean -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-false "true"^^xsd:boolean = "1"^^xsd:boolean -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-true T=T T=1 1=T 1=1 F=F F=0 0=F 0=0 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-xsdtype graph match canonical lexical form of "false" -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-false-canonical graph match on the canonical lexical form of "true" -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-true-canonical = match on the canonical lexical result of an EBV -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-ebv-canonical -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +81.90.6533.3882 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 01:49:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 September 2011 16:31:42 GMT