W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:02:36 +0000
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20060111160236.GS26293@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:38:38AM -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> >I care, but I dont totally understand the issues (I'm WSDL  
> >illiterate). I
> >want to be able to send back any reasonable HTTP code for uncommon
> >conditions (eg. server segfaults, out of memory), but as far as I  
> >can see
> >you both think that should be OK.
> I do. I don't think Andy does because of the "must" and the broad way  
> he reads "refuses". But I've proposed text to Andy that he seems to  
> favor, so we'll see how that goes.
> My other suggestion was just to drop this WSDL fault completely. I've  
> convinced myself that it's pretty useless and unnecessary.

That seems sensible to me, it's not clear what a generic WSDL handling
thing would make of it anyway.

- Steve 
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 16:02:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC