W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:15:12 -0500
Message-Id: <F2594A3F-DE2F-4836-94C1-0CD314FAA6A8@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>

On Jan 6, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

> The other headers are not overloaded in this way - thay are not  
> mentioned by the general mapping of WSDL to HTTP nor in our  
> specific example.

No, but as I just learned (or relearned, or something...), you can  
specify an HTTP header as part of a WSDL fault, and you can say  
whether that header is required or not. I believe that effectively  
makes headers part (conceivably) of a WSDL fault serialized in HTTP.  
We don't have that in our design, but I thought this was a point  
worth making (especially since I think I denied it explicitly  
somewhere in this thread).


Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 18:15:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC