W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Jan

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 10:53:54 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1136393635.20839.321.camel@dirk.w3.org>

hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda

plain text:

    1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
          + [1]RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2006-01-05T16:00Z
            ([2]local times)
               o teleconference bridge: [3]+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
          + supplementary IRC chat: [4]#dawg
               o [5]log to appear
          + scribe: Jeen Broekstra
          + PROPOSED: to accept [6]DAWG Weekly -- 20 Dec 2005 as a true
            record
          + roll call ([7]wg membership). regrets: Libby, Bijan
          + next meeting:
            PROPOSED: to meet next 10 Jan. scribe?.
          + Let's continue these without discussion: (none)
          + Let's note these done without discussion:
               o ACTION: AndyS to respond re CONSTRUCT *. [8]done
               o ACTION: AndyS to Revise rq23 to reflect the decison
                 (remove told bnode text) Done v 1.598 of [9]QL
                 editor's draft
               o ACTION: Jeen to edit results format per C 'collapsed'
                 ; drop sorting constraint. Done in 2005-12-21 rev of
                 [10]editor's draft
               o ACTION: Lee to review XSLT in results format update.
                 [11]done
          + Comments on the agenda?
            I suspect I have missed some outstanding business, but it's
            time to ship this agenda, I think.
    2. issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
          + ACTION: KendallC to propose revised WSDL descripton of
            SPARQL protocol
          + ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t.
            WSDL 2.0 constraints
       also: [12]query by reference Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 15
       November)
    3. Toward updated protocol WD (@@and results format WD)
          + ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of
            http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to
            protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the
            section in rq23 itself
          + ACTION: KendallC to remove uses of "my" in URIs in protocol
            spec
       [13]editor's draft shows progress on at least 5 of 14
       outstanding comments
    4. protocol testing update
          + ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
            results
          + ACTION: EliasT to recruit somebody to try out the protocol
            test harness, perhaps from the -comments list
    5. issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction
          + ACTION: Bijan to take a pass through the editor's draft,
            listing what will change with the new semantics
            understanding, and what will not. in post-meeting chat 20
            Dec, Bijan clarified that he considers this discharged by
            [14]Enrico's SPARQL Semantics document msg of 24 Oct. I'm
            inclined to agree that it's DONE.
          + ACTION PatH: to get Enrico's feedback on PatH's proposal to
            stick to the Last Call design. We implicitly withdrew this
            last week. In any case, it's... [15]DONE 27 Dec
          + ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's draft,
            listing what will change with the new semantics
            understanding. In addition to [16]SPARQL Semantics document
            of 24 Oct, we now have [17]specific wording proposals 29
            Dec and [18]2 Jan.
            I don't see that anyone has responded to this invitation to
            complete the QL syntax details of the proposal...

      [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
      [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=1&day=5&year=2006&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=0
      [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
      [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
      [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/05-dawg-irc
      [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/att-0384/20-dawg-minutes.html
      [7] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
      [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Dec/0036.html
      [9] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
     [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/
     [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0392.html
     [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0231.html
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
     [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html
     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0390.html
     [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html
     [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0395.html
     [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0000.html

     Please, find your favourite way to specify a query with a
     non-default entailment (at FUB, by now, we don't have any
     favourite way yet). [19]29 Dec
            though I note the LC design is unacceptable to FUB:

     [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0395.html

     For FUB it is unacceptable to have a standard which does not
     provide a hook for entailment.
     ibid
    6. issues#valueTesting
          + ACTION EricP: add test case for support of xsd:boolean (ala
            (?a = ?b) = "true"^^xsd:boolean )
    7. Toward CR
          + 31 Jan 2006 charter end date approaches. see also:
            [20]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases... schedule
            review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
          + [21]lc status (also: lists in editor's drafts)
          + substantive changes... 20 Dec rf1 change (jeen offered to
            do a test case). @@link to summary of changes in rq23. no
            changes to protocol that are observable on-the-wire, right?
          + Charmod conformance; my [22]OK? message has a forward
            reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG review
            in reply
          + The "use XQuery" objection from NI was largely addressed by
            a presentation from Melton at XML2005
       Dependencies:
          + XQuery WG review ([23]rxd 13Sep)
          + meet requirements of ebXML Registry TC and freebXML
            Registry open source implementation? ([24]10 Nov from
            Farrukh)
          + charter calls for "architectural review" by [25]Semantic
            Web Best Practices and Deployment (SWBPD) Working Group
            [26]Wood 26 Sep is relevant, as Wood is a co-chair of SWBPD
            WG
          + [27]ietf-types review of application/sparql-results+xml ,
            [28]ietf-types review of application/sparql-query
    8. test suite maintenance
          + ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes for
            later WG approval [29]DONE
          + ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with
            negative tests [recorded in
            [30]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
          + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
            op:dateTime triple
          + ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from
            comment on truth tables in [31]commentor's message

     [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
     [22] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
     [23] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050913082804661.00000000668@amalhotr-pc
     [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0267.html
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/BestPractices/
     [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0077.html
     [27] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000895.html
     [28] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000894.html
     [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
     [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:54:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT