W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: comment on A.7 "Grammar"

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:55:03 +0100
Message-Id: <05986E47-67F8-40D2-8DCD-63BD764872A0@garlik.com>
To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On 10 Jun 2006, at 20:35, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>> Strictly speaking, commas may be unnecessary since SELECT ?a ?b + ?c
>> can be parsed.
> Unbracketed expressions would need commas to know when they end and  
> a new one start.  Given we are in CR, mandatory commas would be a  
> significant change.

Is that a huge setback? I'm not sure of the process implications.

Given that the commas-in-triple-patterns consistency problem is gone  
is seems a bit unfortunate to stick with a decision that results from  

> I hope I've shown that expressions in SELECT are possible.

You have, but not that it's particularly pleasant syntax.

- Steve
Received on Sunday, 11 June 2006 06:55:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:51 UTC