- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:27:59 -0500
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:56 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 09:54 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > [...] > >> so that makes fn:compare: > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functionscompare > >> > >> Ugh. > > > > I don't think so. > > > > I think their rule for making URIs for functions gives: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions#compare > > > > see http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3121 , which > > is a bug reported by me about the namespace document not agreeing > > with the spec, where Norm confirms that > > the full URI for fn:starts-with is > > http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions#starts-with > > > > > > Dan, > > Thanks for the correction - it's good to know there is a suitable URI. > Reading the namespace document The namespace document is acknowledged to be buggy. See above. > in the CR version it is: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#name > > for all op: and fn: operations. > > If we follow the same route, we'd get something like: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/sparql-functions/#datatype I advise against that last / > and put a namespace document at http://www.w3.org/2006/sparql-functions > > EricP - can we automatically generate the namespace doc from rq23? > > Andy > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:28:12 UTC