- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:49:36 -0400
- To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Folks,
An attenuated agenda for tomorrow since today's a US holiday:
1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at
13:30:00 UTC
([2]local times)
+ Comments on the agenda?
+ teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
+ scribe: EricP
o supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
+ roll call
+ PROPOSED: to approve [6]RDF Data Access Working Group
weekly telecon -- 9 May 2006 as a true record
2. XTech & WWW SPARQL/DAWG show reports
3. JSON results format -- update on where we stand
4. valueTesting -- update on where we stand
5. test suite maintenance -- update on where we stand
6. Renewed interest in SADDLE? Cf. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/
Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0089.html> and followup thread
7. Device Description Repository Use Case? Cf. <http://lists.w3.org/
Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0066>:
It would be therefore nice if, in future, such database would be or
at least could be
implemented using a current or future version of SPARQL.
We were wondering whether it would it be possible for the group to
have a look at this document to see if the DDR
could be a possible use case for current or future version of SPARQL?
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?
month=5&day=30&year=2006&hour=9&min=30&sec=0&p1=43
[3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
[5] http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/
0083.html
Cheers,
Kendall
Received on Monday, 29 May 2006 18:50:01 UTC