W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: agenda, 9 May 2006 telcon

From: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:09:55 -0400
To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFC566BAF8.092DA0D6-ON85257168.006EADC1-85257168.006EC5A1@us.ibm.com>

regrets. I have a conflicting work meeting just this one time, but I'll be
on IRC if needed.

-Elias

public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org wrote on 05/08/2006 03:49:30 PM:

>
> Folks,
>
> Please forgive the lateness of this agenda, but I'm new at this and
> there's a learning curve.
>
> 1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-05-09T14:30Z
>     ([2]local times)
>        + Comments on the agenda? (please excuse the lateness: new
> chair!)
>        + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>        + scribe: to be recruited
>             o supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>               ([5]log to appear)
>        + roll call
>        + PROPOSED: to approve [6]RDF Data Access Working Group
>             weekly telecon -- 18 Apr 2006 as a true record
> 2. Future meetings PROPOSED: to meet again @@when; recruit scribe;
>     -- discuss future meeting times
> 3. JSON results format
>        + ACTION: EricP to publish
>          http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/json-sparql/
> 4. punctuationSyntax: bnodes in predicate
>        + ACTION: DanC find decision record for bnodes in predicate
> 5. valueTesting
>        + ACTION: EricPto figure out what our spec says re: casting
>          illegal lexical forms
> 6. test suite maintenance
>        + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
>          op:dateTime triple
>        + ACTION: EricP and Jeen to fix OPTIONAL coding
>     See also [7]comment threads marked [test-todo] and [8]REQUEST
>     FOR TESTCASE in WG threads
> 7. MIME type registrations
>        + ACTION: EricP to respond to [9]Dirk on MIME type stuff
>        + ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests ([10]2Mar)
> 8. UC&R end-game.
>     We didn't do a last call review, so it's not in order to request
>     CR for it. Let's make it a NOTE, shall we? Or should we take it
>     to last call during CR?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
> [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?
> month=04&day=18&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
> [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
> [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc
> [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/
> 0052.html
> [7] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-rdf-
> dawg-comments&index-type=t&keywords=test-todo&search=Search
> [8] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=request+for
> +testcase&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-
> grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-rdf-dawg
> [9] http://www.w3.org/mid/
> 20060309013957.F70758@skutsje.san.webweaving.org
> [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf6#pubIssues
>
> Cheers,
> Kendall
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 20:10:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:26 GMT