Re: more on bnodes in predicate positions

Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> (In response to Andy's message at: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0027 )
> 
> In addition to the referenced syntax tests being incorrect, this text in 
> the draft should also be amended or struck:
> 
> """
> This definition also allows blank nodes in the predicate position.
> """
> 
> ( http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#defn_TriplePattern )
> 
> I'd suggest either removing it or changing it to
> 
> """
> Note that this definition does not allow blank nodes in the predicate 
> position.
> """
> 
> 
> Lee
> 

Text removed - thanks for spotting that.

	Andy