W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2006

more on bnodes in predicate positions

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:02:56 -0400
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF486C5B8E.359AFB2C-ON8525715E.005D75E2-8525715E.005DA489@us.ibm.com>

(In response to Andy's message at: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0027 )

In addition to the referenced syntax tests being incorrect, this text in 
the draft should also be amended or struck:

This definition also allows blank nodes in the predicate position.

( http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#defn_TriplePattern )

I'd suggest either removing it or changing it to

Note that this definition does not allow blank nodes in the predicate 

Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 17:02:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:51 UTC