W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: SPARQL semantics: open issue bnodeRef

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:57:33 -0600
To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>, Brian McBride <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Message-Id: <1135886253.20839.63.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 17:04 +0100, Enrico Franconi wrote:
> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#bnodeRef
> >
> > We'll need new information in order to re-open bnodeRef
> > and consider designs.
> 
> Aren't you happy of the lengthy discussion in the SWBP WG I was  
> mentioning?


I don't see that it provides any information that the DAWG
didn't consider in making its decision on bnodeRef, no.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 19:57:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT