On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 17:04 +0100, Enrico Franconi wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#bnodeRef > > > > We'll need new information in order to re-open bnodeRef > > and consider designs. > > Aren't you happy of the lengthy discussion in the SWBP WG I was > mentioning? I don't see that it provides any information that the DAWG didn't consider in making its decision on bnodeRef, no. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 29 December 2005 19:57:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT