W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:21:59 -0500
Message-Id: <66426268-1D45-4E1D-9F38-336F789E1577@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>


On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> To reply to two points at once; you asked for clarification of in  
> what way
> the collapsed option is not fully-functional. It is not fully  
> functional
> in that it does not support position-based indexing as the LC  
> design does.

Thanks, Lee. Thought that's what you meant.

>
> If that is not a desirable property, then I believe that the best  
> approach
> is to eliminate this requirement from the results format (and then  
> going
> with option 'c' is less objectionable).

I find that I do no desire it, nor do I object to it. :>

Cheers,
Kendall
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 17:27:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT