Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed)

On Dec 14, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

>
> 'c' eliminates the indexed-based approach to parsing the results. At
> the very least, I feel that if the Working Group decides on option 'c'
> than the requirement that variable name order be preserved within
> the resultset should be removed.

I don't think UMD would object to that. I've never thought that was  
worth the pain anyway.

FYI. ;>

Cheers,
Kendall