On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:50:33PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:14:52PM -0500, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > PROPOSED: adopt current text of section 11, Tests, striking the red > > text and adding including the green text. > > > > I think this reflects the changes since the LC document. I think that > > the diffs in red and green is the best way to review the changes. > > What red text and what green text? I see a smattering of red text, and > quite a bit of green, but I'm not sure its the green text you mean. In section 11, there is text with a red background and text with a green background. First example is the addtion of xsd:boolean (in green) to the supported datatypes. > Also, is it possible to have a truth table and/or text for logical not? > The definition in http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-not ignores > type errors. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-boolean [[ ... In all other cases, fn:boolean raises a type error [err:FORG0006]. ]] We also have: [[ Any expression other than logical or (||) or logical and (&&) that encounters a type error will produce a type error. ]] -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +81.90.6533.3882 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 14:39:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:03 GMT