W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:39:15 -0600
To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna.biz>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, kendall@monkeyfist.com
Message-Id: <1134423555.2319.353.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 16:29 +0100, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> Following up on myself here. This discussion is of relevance to Ron
> Alford's comments to the WG regarding unbound variables in the SPARQL
> query results XML format (see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0043 ).
[...]
> Do we have enough data here to perhaps put it on next telcon's agenda
> and make a decision one way or the other?

I'd like to think so.

But I don't see a crisp proposal.

Can you state the proposal in a paragraph or so, along with a
test case/example?

Or can you update the editor's draft?

> Cheers,
> 
> Jeen
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0043
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 21:39:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT