W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

another audit of SPARQL QL references

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:20:26 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1132640426.2319.31.camel@dirk>

In the course of summarizing changes, I saw some stuff that
prompted me to audit references again. I added a bunch
of class="norm" and class="inform" in rev 1.555
of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ , but
some anomalies remain.

Details are attached.

Some notes:

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ is linked
      but not cited in informativeRefs bibliography.

Do we want the dated or undated version of that? I think the
link got added for the reification example, so I guess we
want the undated version; any updates are almost certainly OK
by us.



	link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative:
	[http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil]
	"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"

hmm... why is that a link? I guess so the link checker will help
notice if it's broken. But does the link checker even grok RDF?


	link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative:
	[URIref]
	"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#section-URI-Vocabulary"

I just sent mail about how I think that should go away.


	link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative:
	[typed literal]
	"http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-typed-literal"

oops; I think I just missed that one.


	link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative:
	[How to Register a Media Type for a W3C Specification]
	"http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype"
      

	link is neither local, part, informative, nor normative:
	[Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use]
	"http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime"

Hmm... add these to the list of informative refs? Or just leave them as
is?


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 06:20:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT