W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

"RDF URI references" obsolete in favor of IRIs, no?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:47:58 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1132638478.2319.19.camel@dirk>

In reviewing normative/informative references, I found this:

  <p>When referring to type, the term <code class="type
numeric">numeric</code> denotes the types xsd:integer, xsd:decimal,
xsd:float, and xsd:double; the term <code class="type IRI">IRI</code>
denotes a <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#section-URI-Vocabulary">URIref</a>


but w.r.t.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#badIRIRef
we discussed IRIs vs RDF URI references and decided to go with IRIs,
and leave RDF URI references out of the picture.

I guess this text was there in 1.538, so it'll go out with the
publication we're doing this week, but let's look again soonish, OK?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 05:48:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT