W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:55:28 +0000
Message-ID: <437DA510.9020107@hp.com>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org



Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:06:24AM -0500, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:52:40AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>>
>>>On Nov 15, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>>
>>>>The WG decided to publish 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note, plus
>>>>... today. The note was to reflect a disagreement between Andy
>>>>and myself about Effective Boolean Value. I wanted to stick with
>>>>the XQuery semantics but Andy pointed out that they changed since
>>>>I used them to establish the SPARQL EBV rules.
>>>
>>>Hmm... before or after XQuery went to last call?
>>
>>dunno. should have looked then, but i didn't
>>
>>
>>>Did they highlight the change in a changes section of their CR?
>>>I wonder if they have a test case that ensures that implementors
>>>will notice the change.
>>
>>I'm inclined to let this bookkeeping/auditing detail drop unless
>>I come accross relevent facts while recovering now.
> 
> 
> I put together some notes about how XQuery evaluation works [XT], but
> haven't checked the XQuery, XPath, and XPath F&O change logs.
> 
> 
>>>>The previous rules
>>>>were basically, TRUE for all but a few known types with known FALSE
>>>>values. The new rules have type errors for all but known types. I'm
>>>>happy to switch to the new rules, but the WG voted on the old ones.
>>>>DanC, advice?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Please just add some (more) "red text" about this ... anything that you 
>>>and Andy
>>>are both comfortable publishing...  and continue toward publication.
>>
>>Sounds good; working on that now.
> 
> 
> Added issue text to 11.2.1 Invocation [INV] and 11.2.2 Effective
> Boolean Value [EBV]. Andy, are you up late tonight?

No.

> I think your
> OK completes the editorial part of:
>   PROPOSED: to publish 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note, plus
>   rdfs:Datatype/DATATYPE change in table, DATATYPE("abc")=string?
>   note, plus, we hope, edited changelog by DanC
> (though feedback is expected and appreciated).

I have read the chnages and they look good to publish.

	Andy


> 
> 
> [XT] http://www.w3.org/2005/11/XQueryTour/
> [INV] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#invocation
> [EBV] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#ebv
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 09:55:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT