On Nov 15, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > The WG decided to publish 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note, plus > ... today. The note was to reflect a disagreement between Andy > and myself about Effective Boolean Value. I wanted to stick with > the XQuery semantics but Andy pointed out that they changed since > I used them to establish the SPARQL EBV rules. Hmm... before or after XQuery went to last call? Did they highlight the change in a changes section of their CR? I wonder if they have a test case that ensures that implementors will notice the change. > The previous rules > were basically, TRUE for all but a few known types with known FALSE > values. The new rules have type errors for all but known types. I'm > happy to switch to the new rules, but the WG voted on the old ones. > DanC, advice? > Please just add some (more) "red text" about this ... anything that you and Andy are both comfortable publishing... and continue toward publication. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:52:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:03 GMT