W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005


From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:25:34 +0000
To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20051111162534.GA3219@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

Whilst tidying up my EBV implementation yesterday, I noticed an
inconsistency between the tests and the wording in rq23.

rq23 (11.2.2 Effective Boolean Value) has that all operands are true,

an xsd:boolean with a FALSE value.
a 0-length untyped RDF literal or xsd:string.
any numeric type with a value of 0.
an xsd:double or xsd:float with a value of NaN

implies that FILTER("foo"^^:unknown) fails, either through a type error or
just because its false, but the spec doesn't back this up.

On IRC Andy pointed out that assuming all things of unknown types are true
is a bit closed-wordly, I'm not aure if I agree with that or not, but it
needs more clarity.

- Steve
Received on Friday, 11 November 2005 16:25:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:49 UTC