W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: on SPARQL, various

From: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:21:09 -0500
Message-Id: <E88DDE0D-043A-4DAD-B9AC-BBE547B08011@softwarememetics.com>
Cc: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@csail.mit.edu>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Hi Dan,

You have not seen it because it is just a draft.  The SWBP will be  
discussing it during our ftf.  From the agenda at [1]:

> SATURDAY 5 NOVEMBER
> ...
> 14:15-15:00
> LIAISON
>
>    DAWG
>    Review of SPARQL
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/ 
> 0107.html

Thanks for your clarifications.  I have noted them and will discuss  
them during the above agendum.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0236.html

Regards,
Dave



On Nov 3, 2005, at 16:40, Dan Connolly wrote:
> I just discovered these comments that weren't sent to us.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0107.html
>
> A couple quick notes
>
> "8)  There does not seem to be any way to force a literal into the
> variable position in a binding."
>
> I think isLiteral() will do what you want there.
>
>
> "3)  UNSAID would have been of great concern with regards to
> scalability, just in case it comes back :)"
>
> It never left. It's called UNBOUND with OPTIONAL, but it's
> in there.
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 04:21:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT