W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Small errors in SPARQL Protocol examples

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:21:31 -0500
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF84DB10F2.0AFDFA32-ON852570AB.006F74C8-852570AB.006FD415@us.ibm.com>
Greetings, Everyone:

Replying to myself to correct something / suggest a different protocol 

Lee Feigenbaum/Cambridge/IBM wrote on 10/24/2005 05:26:20 PM:

> Howdy -
> Looking at:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/#query-bindings-soap
> Specifically at 2.3.1 SOAP Example:
> In the request, the outer "query" element should be "query-request". 

This is still true.

> The inner "query" element right now has xmlns="" attached to it, which 
should be 
> removed.

This was not true. As the sparql-protocol-types.xsd schema stands now, the
inner "query" element is without a namespace and so the example is 
That said, I think the schema should be updated so that all elements are 
within the same namespace, whether they be top-level elements or 
The easiest way to do this, I believe, is to add the attribute:


to our <xs:schema> element.
> The Content-Length should then change appropriately =)
> Also, in the sample responses in and, a couple of random 
> characters seem to have wandered in on the sparql results format 
> prefix declarations:
> <sparql xmlns="  http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#">
> I was also wondering if anyone else found it worthwhile to expand 
> the SOAP bindings example
> to include at least one default graph and one named graph? I don't 
> mind only having a single
> SOAP example, but it'd probably be best, in my opinion, if it 
> illustrated all of the elements that
> can comprise a query request.

Still all this.

> thanks,
> Lee

And still this. :-)

Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 20:21:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:49 UTC