Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?

Preliminary evidence suggests that:
	"""Ie, <binding ...><unbound/></binding> compresses to the same as 
<binding .../>"""

I.e., that:
	"""11 to 13 percent difference between the two compressed"""

He is comparing processing time with a modified XSLT script (to get 
transformation difficulty/speed rather than just parse time).

However, this does suggest that a reasonable response is that we expect 
gzipping to be the standard way of dealing with the transmission 
overhead of the verbosity.

We do have some concerns about processing results on mobile devices, 
but perhaps these arguments can be mobilized against any format not 
specifically designed for them (or, perhaps binary XML is the 
answer...I don't know).

Cheers,
Bijan.