W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:18:09 +0100
Message-ID: <435CED21.2080105@hp.com>
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
CC: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org



Kendall Clark wrote:
> On 13:29, Mon 24 Oct 05, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
>>== "select-refused"
>>
>>Not sure why the query is to be refused.
>>
>>I'd return a 400 (BAD REQUEST) if query is sent that the (mythical) service 
>>description had said it was not supported in some way (e.g. described 
>>dataset but the service only has a fixed dataset).  It is not a server 
>>error if the client sends a request the server has said it can't handle.
> 
> 
> This is *really* a comment against the protocol spec, isn't it? One I've
> heard from and discussed with Steve a long time ago (well, relatively
> speaking), and one we discussed during the telcon on IRC last week.

I am reporting what I discovered in trying to reproduce the test suite that 
Elias has spent time creating.

We discussed the general principle in the telecon.  Here, I was wondering if 
this were the right return code for this particular test.

	Andy
Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 14:18:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT