oops... this LCWD http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ cite and editor's draft version of the results format. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ It should have cited the published WD. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20050801/ Ah... it seems there are essentially no differences betwen them, so maybe it doesn't matter too much. But let's get that fixed for next time. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 13 October 2005 17:44:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:03 GMT