On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 14:39 -0400, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > Please see the attached minutes. Thanks for getting these out right away. They're probably close enough; I don't know if any of these comments merits sending out another draft. I might check them into CVS and edit them if I get inspired. But most likely your attachment and this message with comments/ammendments will suffice. somehow I forgot to put a pointer to the agenda into IRC http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/att-0039/_ag11Oct.html Much of the stuff under item 5 sort actually belongs under item 6 valueTesting. I think this one is done: ACTION: ericp to draft lang-match design, summarizing and citing RFC3066 hmm... I wonder what this one means ACTION: EricP: respond to comment on valueTesting issue we haven't closed valueTesting yet I think we acknowledged this as done too ACTION: Lee to elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff with tools. as well as KC's part of... ACTION: KC, EricP to review WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol publication candidate, once a candidate pointer is mailed to the WG > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 21:02:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:03 GMT