W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

ok if URIs for SPARQL interface etc. ends with paren? (serviceDescription)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:46:06 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1128631566.28805.398.camel@dirk>

According to latest word from the WSDL WG, the (standard) URI for our
interface will be...

i.e. something that can't be used as a qname in RDF/XML nor turtle.

Is that good enough? I need to say within the next week or so if not.

I can't think if any show-stopper reason why not, though it sure isn't pretty.

For details, the thread starts with
and culminates with

This is mostly related to serviceDescription, which we've

But by the time we (or somebody like us) pick it up, it'll
be too late to give technical input on WSDL 2.0.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 20:46:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:49 UTC