1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
  2. RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-09-13T14:30Z (local times in major cities)
  3. teleconference bridge: +1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  4. supplementary IRC chat: #dawg
  5. log (to appear)
  6. scribe: ??
  7. roll call: regrets JosD
  8. PROPOSED: to accept minutes 6 Sep as a true record
  9. next meeting: 20 Sep?
  10. DanC has a conflict: TAG ftf meeting
  11. scribe volunteer?
  12. Let's continue these without discussion:
  13. ACTION: EricP to extend < and relational ops to string, get review by Andy
  14. ACTION: DanC to ask I18N WG for review of < on strings
  15. ACTION: DaveB to find query with FILTER on URIs
  16. ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
  17. ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
  18. ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization (ref 28 Jun discussion)
  19. ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) ref ftf5 BOS discussion
  20. comments on agenda?
  21. I reached my tolerance for PoorMansHypertext, so I'm trying evolution's HTML editor
  22. Toward Protocol Last Call
  23. ACTION KC: make changes as agreed in 6 Sep discussion
  24. 1.71 editor's draft ready for LC pub 
  25. ACTION EricP: publish proto-wd v 1.68 + changes from as LCWD
  26. SPARQL Protocol and WSDL
  27. ACTION: LeeF to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias ETA 9 sep
  28. ACTION: DanC to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2 SPARQL protocol stuff, once both are available
  29. ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on describing POST binding with application/x-form-encoded in WSDL 2
  30. cf Data Access WG questions about WSDL of 15 Aug 2005
  31. ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on moving "style" from interface to binding
  32. FYI: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0 Dan Connolly (Friday, 9 September) to public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
  33. comment: SPARQL Protocol: inconsistent parameter names
  34. ACTION: KC to respond to inconsistent parameter names commentor
  35. can't quite tell if this is done. 2005-09-06T15:35:18Z from kendall is progress, perhaps
  36. issues#valueTesting : "language tag issues"
  37. ACTION: ericp to draft lang-match design, summarizing and citing RFC3066
  38. BASE IRI resolution comment
  39. ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern. re BASE IRI resolution comment
  40. issues#valueTesting: handling type "error"s
  41. ACTION: EricP to get SteveH's response to 0360 modifying truth table for OR
  42. issues#rdfSemantics
  43. note new issue; enumerate known options; initial straw poll
  44. issues#owlDisjunction
  45. note new issue; enumerate known options; initial straw poll
  46. SPARQL QL grammar
  47. rq23 grammar update Seaborne, Andy (Wednesday, 24 August)
  48. test cases, e.g. SELECT ?x WHERE {.}
  49. various comments on variable names, etc.
  50. issues#badIRIRef
  51. Let's look at the case of SELECT ?x WHERE { <foo###bar> dc:title ?x } and recent grammar work.
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E