W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

twinql Retrospective motivates DESCRIBE refinement?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:33:25 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1127828005.6446.122.camel@dirk>

Did we consider this design already?


>    As I write, it occurs to me that some way to say which method is  
> being (server -> client), or should be (client -> server), used for  
> DESCRIBE would be desirable -- I'd like my clients to know that  
> they're getting CBDs, or the clients might wish to ask for a certain  
> kind of description.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0063


I'm considering re-opening issues#DESCRIBE. Advice is welcome.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2005 13:33:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT