- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:24:22 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Sep 27, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:36 -0400, Bijan Parsia wrote: >> I notice no actions for: >> issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction >> >> even though we gave some. > > Oh? I need more clues. I have looked and I haven't found any. http://www.w3.org/2005/09/20-dawg-irc e.g., 16:00:05 [ericP] ACTION Bijon: take a pass through the editor's draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding, and what will not 16:00:11 [ericP] ACTION Enrico: take a pass through the editor's draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding, and 16:01:55 [ericP] ACTION Pat: summarize the entailment consensus I thought there were some relating to use and test cases but I don't see 'em. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2005 05:24:38 UTC