W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Approving more tests?

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:55:28 +0100
To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050926165527.GJ14226@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

I've like to propose some old tests that have been around for a while for
approval. I guess noone will be willing to vote in telecol on 2005-09-27,
but the week after maybe?

In particular:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-bound
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-bound-2
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-isuri
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-isblank
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-isliteral
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-str
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-testing-values-lang

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-001
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-002
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-003
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-opt-query-004

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-select-1
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-select-2
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-select-3

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-001
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-002
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-003
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#regex-query-004

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-1
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-2
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-3
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#str-4

For the record I currently fail regex-query-001 because I dont do case
sensitive regexs, and str-4 because I return a skolemised form when you call
str() on bNodes, but I'm happy with the tests.

Also, there are 4 tests that were approved with the old syntax,
simple2/dawg-triple-pattern-00[1234] - they are mirrored by tests with the
new syntax in simple/, but what should be done about them? Marked as
negative tests, or just removed? I take it that the action of approving
the replacements implicitly unapproved them, but maybe not.

- Steve
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 16:56:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT