Checking the current editors' draft, the only uses of "bnode" are: 1/ The grammar BNODE_LABEL (to refer to the forms like "_:a"); the grammar rule for blank nodes is "BlankNode" and the string "bnode" is not used elsewhere in the document. I have changed it to BLANK_NODE_LABEL. 2/ In some <!-- --> comments including the casting table. 3/ CVS log It was in the LC document in 11.1 as "* r:bNode (blank node)" but that has gone. Andy -------- Original Message -------- Subject: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:34:55 +0000 Resent-From: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:34:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org The terms "bnode" and "blank node" are both used in the document. One should be defined as a shorthand of the other or, preferable, only one should be used. Peter F. Patel-SchneiderReceived on Monday, 26 September 2005 11:29:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:02 GMT