W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Fwd: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:29:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4337DB8B.40600@hp.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Checking the current editors' draft, the only uses of "bnode" are:

1/ The grammar BNODE_LABEL (to refer to the forms like "_:a"); the grammar 
rule for blank nodes is "BlankNode" and the string "bnode" is not used 
elsewhere in the document.

I have changed it to BLANK_NODE_LABEL.

2/ In some <!-- --> comments including the casting table.

3/ CVS log


It was in the LC document in 11.1 as "* r:bNode (blank node)" but that has gone.

	Andy

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:34:55 +0000
Resent-From: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:34:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org


The terms "bnode" and "blank node" are both used in the document.  One should
be defined as a shorthand of the other or, preferable, only one should be used.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 11:29:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT