Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 13 Sep

Dan Connolly wrote:
>    1.   *Convene, take roll, review records and agenda*
> 
>        2. RDF Data Access WG <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/>
>           teleconference 2005-09-13T14:30Z (local times in major cities
>           <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=30&month=08&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>)
> 
>        3. teleconference bridge: +1.617.761.6200 <tel:+1.617.761.6200>
>           code:7333
>        4. supplementary IRC chat: #dawg <irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg>
> 
>            5. log <http://www.w3.org/2005/09/13-dawg-irc> (to appear) 
> 
>        6. scribe: ??
>        7. roll call: regrets JosD
>        8. *PROPOSED:* to accept minutes 6 Sep
>           <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/att-0363/06-dawg-minutes.html>
>           as a true record
>        9. next meeting: 20 Sep?
> 
>           10. DanC has a conflict: TAG ftf meeting
>           11. scribe volunteer? 
> 
>       12. Let's continue these without discussion:
> 
>           13. *ACTION: EricP* to extend < and relational ops to string,
>               get review by Andy
>           14. *ACTION: DanC* to ask I18N WG for review of < on strings
>           15. *ACTION: DaveB* to find query with FILTER on URIs
>           16. *ACTION: DanC* to follow up re optional test based on
>               op:dateTime triple
>           17. *ACTION: DaveB* to to propose source test to approve
>           18. *ACTION: SteveH* to review the relevant test case re: IRI
>               normalization (ref 28 Jun discussion)
>               <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/28-dawg-minutes>
>           19. *ACTION: AndyS* to add the above graph test cases
>               (analagous to valueTesting test cases) ref ftf5 BOS
>               discussion
>               <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html> 

Done (see tests/data/Expr/*graph*)

These tests depend on whether datatype entailment is being done or not.  The 
results as recorded are for when datatype entailment is not done.


> 
>       20. comments on agenda?
> 
>           21. I reached my tolerance for PoorMansHypertext,
>               <http://esw.w3.org/topic/PoorMansHypertext> so I'm trying
>               evolution's HTML editor 

This is a sample of what it looks like in Thunderbird (the HTML has the same 
numbering).  Every line has a number, starting from the level above.  This is 
also the format of the plain text copy.

In Outlook, the HTML converted to plain text version is as above, the HTML 
view has numbering of each item the same as it next level up - so all things 
in top-level 1, are numbered 1 etc.

 Andy

Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2005 08:46:16 UTC