Re: Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"

On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 17:32 +0200, Enrico Franconi wrote:
> > PDF is pretty inconvenient to work with. I tried some tools for
> > converting it to plain text, but the text seems to be too obscured.
> >
> > Would you please send it in plain text or HTML?
> 
> <http://www.inf.unibz.it/krdb/w3c/sparql-notes-fub.html>

Thanks; that's much easier to read.

I think that between my reply about the SOURCE/UNSAID issue
and Andy's replies about simple entailment and OPTIONAL
and UNION, I think most of your comments have had some
response.

I'll stay tuned to see if consensus emerges from the
email thread before I put together the agenda Monday
for our next teleconference on Tuesday.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E