W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: rq23 grammar update

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:26:47 -0500
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1125408407.16011.365.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 10:34 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > Hmm... that seems to say that we're using a notation that's very similar
> > to the XML 1.1 grammar notation, but with a few tweaks. The sections
> > on comments, keywords, whitespace and escapes are grammar
> > notation tweaks.
> 
> Yes - the XML 1.1 notation section is referenced.

But it's reference by saying "The EBNF format is the same as that used
in the XML 1.1 specification[XML11]" but as we're discussing, our
notation is not quite the same. I suggest


  The EBNF format here uses the following notational conventions
  in addition to the XML 1.1 specification notation.



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 13:30:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT