W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: Sorting

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:53:34 +0100
To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050815135334.GA22126@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:29:42 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > you might hope to get the highest v's back, but to my reading of the
> > spec you will get back the one with the most 9s at the start, or something
> > similar, as the ordering is lexical.
> 
> Where do you see that? I see
> 
> "If the ordering condition is a named variable, RDF Literals are
> compared with the "<" operator (see below) where possible."
>  -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#solutionsResults
>  v1.464 of 2005/08/10 15:51:50
>  also in http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/
> 
> and < is defined in the table below...
> 
> A <B numeric numeric op:numeric-less-than(A, B) xs:boolean

Yes, sorry. Ignore my message I was just confused about this again.

- Steve
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 13:56:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT